filing_sections: 412
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 412 | 54 | Kassab's Questions Are Not Vague and Ambiguous | Parties have a duty to use common sense interpreting discovery terms (In re Swepi). Typos do not warrant objections. Criticizes Pohl's counsel (a 'Top 100 Super Lawyer') for claiming inability to understand questions with minor typos. Pohl had to reference the attached document to identify the typo, proving they understood the question. |