filing_sections: 422
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 422 | 55 | B.2.iii — Unlawful acts doctrine | Dugger v. Arredondo establishes the doctrine is no longer viable, preempted by proportionate responsibility. Even if not preempted: (1) controverting evidence on disputed facts, (2) Pohl doesn't need to rely on any illegal act to establish his claims (Carcamo-Lopez), (3) Alderson is factually inapposite (False Claims Act/tax case), (4) no Texas case has adopted the Restatement privilege from Merckle GmbH. |