filing_sections: 425

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
425	57	Summary	Argues barratry is central to the entire case — Pohl's trade secret claim, damages, proportionate responsibility, and Kassab's affirmative defenses. Notes Pohl has made this the subject of several motions seeking similar relief, including a previously withdrawn summary judgment motion on Kassab's affirmative defenses. Pohl's barratry is relevant to TUTSA ownership, willful and malicious misappropriation, damages recovery for defending barratry suits, and proportionate responsibility.