filing_sections: 427

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
427	57	II. Evidence of Pohl's barratrous conduct is directly relevant to Pohl's claims and his own proportionate responsibility	Argues barratry is relevant to: (1) TUTSA ownership — Pohl cannot own trade secrets for information about ongoing illegal activities because a person who obtains property by illegal means acquires no title; (2) tort of another damages theory — has never been embraced by Texas Supreme Court and requires claimant to be an innocent party; (3) willful and malicious misappropriation — Kassab's state of mind regarding Pohl's barratry is relevant to negating this element for TUTSA fees and exemplary damages; (4) proportionate responsibility — whether Pohl caused or contributed 'in any way' to the harm, including the $2.4M+ in actual loss damages and the $1M Precision settlement.