filing_sections: 429

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
429	57	III.A. Whether Pohl committed barratry is directly relevant to many of Kassab's defenses which Pohl has failed to conclusively negate	Unlawful acts doctrine — distinguishes Dugger v. Arredondo as expressly limited to personal injury and wrongful death cases. Cites Sharpe, Luong, Denson, and Villanueva for continued application outside that context. Argues Pohl's claims are inextricably intertwined with his illegal contract with Precision to commit barratry. Notes Kassab incorporates arguments from his August 29, 2022 Traditional MSJ and from Nicholson's September 12, 2022 Response (pp. 9-14 on unlawful acts doctrine).