filings: 42
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| filing_id | date | doc_type | party | description | doc_type_detail | procedural_posture | chain | outcome | phase | filename | relief_requested | full_text |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 2022-10-31 | ORD | Court | Order: FOUR MSJs DENIED | Order Denying All Four Motions for Summary Judgment (Kassab Traditional MSJ, Kassab No-Evidence MSJ, Nicholson Amended Traditional MSJ, and Nicholson/Kassab TUTSA Preemption MSJ) | Court order signed October 31, 2022 by Judge Scot Dollinger and filed November 2, 2022, denying all four pending motions for summary judgment in a single order with no stated reasoning. | MSJ-2 | DENIED | Phase 3 | 2022-10-31_ORD_Denying-Kassab-Trad-and-No-Evid-MSJ_SIGNED.pdf | Filed 22 November 02 A10:22 Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Pgs-1 CAUSE NO. 2018-58419 MFSJY POHL, MICHAEL, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff(s) § S VS. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS S FAVRE, SCOTT, § 189th JUDICIAL DISTRICT Defendant(s) § “ ORDER & SS Pending is THE KASSAB DEFENDANTS’ _ TRADITIONAL xipnion FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed August 29, 2022. & Motion DENIED. @ GP Pending is THE KASSAB DEFENDANTS’ NO-EYOENCE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed August 29, 2022. SS Motion DENIED. Pending is DEFENDANTS TINA NICHOL ( snp BAKER NICHOLSON, LLP D/B/A BAKER NICHOLSON LAW FIRM’S AMENDED TRAD AL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed August 29, 2022. ws Motion DENIED. © ® Pending is NICHOLSON b NDANTS AND KASSAB DEFENDANTS’ TRADITIONAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG, TON TUTSA PREEMPTION filed August 2, 2022. Motion DENIED. -=\ ow Signed October 31, 2022. . It Hulda & Ae) Hon. SCOT DOLLINGER & Judge, 189th District Court & |
Links from other tables
- 1 row from filing_id in chain_steps
- 4 rows from filing_id in filing_sections
- 0 rows from filing_id in legal_theories
- 0 rows from filing_id in citations
- 0 rows from filing_id in statutes
- 4 rows from filing_id in key_assertions
- 4 rows from filing_id in key_facts
- 0 rows from filing_id in evidence_referenced
- 0 rows from filing_id in defenses_raised
- 1 row from filing_id in rulings
- 0 rows from filing_id in appellate_issues