assertion_id,filing_id,assertion
364,21,Assignments of barratry claims (whether complete or partial) are void under Texas law
365,21,Kassab lacks legal capacity to sue and to recover on assigned barratry claims
366,21,Kassab's counterclaim fails to identify the specific cause of action asserted
367,21,Kassab does not identify who the original owners (assignors) of the assigned claims are
368,21,Kassab does not state any facts that give rise to the allegedly assigned barratry claims
369,21,Kassab's assertion of 'counterclaims' based on 'express assignments' from '242 claimants' lacks specificity
370,21,"If the counterclaim facts are the same as those in prior litigation (Brumfield and Gandy), the claims may be barred by res judicata"
371,21,"The factual background section of Kassab's counterclaim appears to be an explanation for why Kassab believes the lawsuit is retaliatory, not the basis of the counterclaims"
372,21,Pohl is unable to ascertain the nature and basic issues presented by the counterclaim in order to adequately defend himself
373,21,Kassab appears more concerned with attacking Pohl than articulating the basis of his claims