home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Key Assertions

1,237 material factual assertions from filings

Data license: Public court records

19 rows where filing_id = 15

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

assertion_id ▼ filing_id assertion
253 15 15 Kassab's TCPA motion was denied by operation of law and Kassab noticed an interlocutory appeal on December 18, 2018
254 15 15 The interlocutory appeal triggers a mandatory stay of all trial court proceedings under § 51.014(b) — actions taken during the stay are voidable
255 15 15 Favre/Precision's TCPA motion was filed after the 60-day deadline without good cause
256 15 15 Favre was served September 14, 2018 — Kassab filed his TCPA motion on the 40th day, which should have alerted Favre to the deadline
257 15 15 Defendants benefited from late filing by tailoring their motion to the court's reaction at the November 5, 2018 hearing
258 15 15 Pohl's claims are not based on any TCPA-protected conduct — they target the wrongful sale of stolen property
259 15 15 Defendants filed no evidentiary support for their TCPA motion — five exhibits attached but not verified
260 15 15 Defendants' association argument confuses necessary and sufficient conditions — TCPA can apply to trade secret claims but does not necessarily apply to all
261 15 15 Defendants' free speech argument improperly focuses on post-wrongful-act conduct rather than the factual basis of liability
262 15 15 The commercial speech exception under § 27.010(b) bars TCPA application because Precision is primarily in the marketing business
263 15 15 Defendants' Motion does not even attempt to argue the commercial exception doesn't apply to Precision
264 15 15 Kassab supplied an affidavit admitting he obtained from Defendants information including names and addresses of Pohl's clients
265 15 15 The Favre-Kassab Agreement contains indemnity and confidentiality provisions evidencing knowledge of wrongful conduct
266 15 15 Favre confirmed under oath that $250,000 was paid, and between payment and April 2017 he received no fees, provided no work, and exchanged no documents
267 15 15 Nicholson's testimony contradicts Favre's regarding who received the Pohl fee contracts
268 15 15 Defendants failed to seek dismissal of the breach of contract claim — it cannot be dismissed
269 15 15 Pohl's claims accrued from the November 10, 2016 Favre-Kassab Agreement, well within all limitations periods
270 15 15 Pohl was not aware of the sale of his information during the two-year period prior to filing
271 15 15 Defendants provided no evidentiary support for attorney's fees — no affidavit documenting services, rates, or time

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
    assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    assertion TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 5.583ms · Data license: Public court records