Key Assertions
Data license: Public court records
19 rows where filing_id = 17
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
| assertion_id ▼ | filing_id | assertion |
|---|---|---|
| 289 | 17 17 | Kassab's motion recycles arguments and limited evidence from the TCPA motion and interlocutory appeal |
| 290 | 17 17 | Kassab filed his MSJ prior to responding to any discovery |
| 291 | 17 17 | Pohl's claims against Kassab accrued no earlier than November 2016 when Kassab purchased the stolen information |
| 292 | 17 17 | The undisputed November 10, 2016 Agreement is the earliest possible accrual date for claims against Kassab |
| 293 | 17 17 | Kassab was still acquiring possession of stolen property in December 2016 per the December 7, 2016 email |
| 294 | 17 17 | Each possession of converted property is a new conversion under Texas law |
| 295 | 17 17 | Pohl's conversion claim accrued no earlier than December 1, 2016 — well within the two-year period |
| 296 | 17 17 | Kassab's evidence about prior wrongdoing by Precision and others does not establish when claims against Kassab specifically accrued |
| 297 | 17 17 | Pohl's deposition testimony only shows knowledge of 'some wrongful conduct by some individuals' at an undefined point prior to May 2018 |
| 298 | 17 17 | Pohl affirmatively testified he was not aware of the claims in this case in the two-year period prior to filing |
| 299 | 17 17 | Kassab was not a party to the Federal Court Case or the settlement agreement |
| 300 | 17 17 | Precision itself did not move for summary judgment on res judicata |
| 301 | 17 17 | The Federal Counterclaim addressed conversion of 'funds' (improper billing), not theft of confidential information |
| 302 | 17 17 | Kassab provides no Texas authority for conspiracy-privity theory — relies only on out-of-state cases |
| 303 | 17 17 | Pohl's June 2018 affidavit reflects post-Federal-Case knowledge and does not establish claims could have been brought in the Federal Court Case |
| 304 | 17 17 | Kassab's purchase of stolen property preceded any attorney-client relationship |
| 305 | 17 17 | Kassab's solicitation and advertising to obtain clients necessarily preceded the 'meeting of the minds' required for attorney-client relationship |
| 306 | 17 17 | Attorney immunity requires conduct within scope of client representation that is not foreign to duties of a lawyer |
| 307 | 17 17 | The First Court of Appeals' commercial-transaction characterization addresses the scope of a commercial transaction, not the scope of Kassab's duties to a client |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
assertion TEXT
);