home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Key Assertions

1,237 material factual assertions from filings

Data license: Public court records

21 rows where filing_id = 18

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

assertion_id ▼ filing_id assertion
308 18 18 Pohl's entire Declaration consists of nothing but conclusory statements insufficient to raise fact issues
309 18 18 Under Texas law, 'a client owns the contents of his or her file' — contradicting Pohl's ownership claims
310 18 18 Pohl's use of 'purported to sell' and 'appears' language constitutes impermissible speculation
311 18 18 Pohl was not a party to the November 10, 2016 Agreement or the December 7, 2016 email, and cannot authenticate them
312 18 18 Pohl's paragraph 10 is internally contradictory regarding who was a party to the Federal Court Case
313 18 18 With Paragraphs 5-10 and Exhibits 1-2 struck, Pohl has no evidence to defeat summary judgment
314 18 18 Pohl testified under oath that Kassab and his 'crew' broke into his office in Gulfport, Mississippi and stole his stuff in 2014
315 18 18 Pohl did not immediately file suit because he 'wanted to spend time to reflect on it before taking action' and 'didn't want to do anything that was precipitous' (Mot. Exhibit 3, at 93)
316 18 18 Pohl does not dispute his deposition testimony in his Response
317 18 18 Pohl never pled the discovery rule, so it does not apply
318 18 18 Even if the discovery rule applied, an office break-in is not inherently undiscoverable
319 18 18 The December 7, 2016 email is unauthenticated hearsay that does not mention Pohl by name
320 18 18 Pohl testified under oath that he learned of the basis of his claims against Kassab during discovery in the Federal Court Case
321 18 18 Pohl testified that Precision and Walker 'undertook to convert, misappropriate' his files and information (Mot. Exhibit 1, par. 28)
322 18 18 Pohl testified information was in 'approximately seventeen clear plastic file containers' and Ladner admitted absconding with them
323 18 18 Pohl judicially admitted that Favre, Precision, and Kassab are co-conspirators, establishing privity for res judicata
324 18 18 Precision was owned by Favre during pendency and settlement of the Federal Court Case
325 18 18 The First Court of Appeals' characterization of Kassab's conduct as involving 'the type of legal services Kassab provides' is the law of the case
326 18 18 Pohl cannot escape the court of appeals opinion no matter how he characterizes the facts
327 18 18 Merely labeling an attorney's conduct 'fraudulent' does not remove it from the scope of client representation
328 18 18 Even criminal conduct is not categorically excepted from attorney civil immunity when connected with representing a client

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
    assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    assertion TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 4.407ms · Data license: Public court records