home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Key Assertions

1,237 material factual assertions from filings

Data license: Public court records

10 rows where filing_id = 21

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

assertion_id ▼ filing_id assertion
364 21 21 Assignments of barratry claims (whether complete or partial) are void under Texas law
365 21 21 Kassab lacks legal capacity to sue and to recover on assigned barratry claims
366 21 21 Kassab's counterclaim fails to identify the specific cause of action asserted
367 21 21 Kassab does not identify who the original owners (assignors) of the assigned claims are
368 21 21 Kassab does not state any facts that give rise to the allegedly assigned barratry claims
369 21 21 Kassab's assertion of 'counterclaims' based on 'express assignments' from '242 claimants' lacks specificity
370 21 21 If the counterclaim facts are the same as those in prior litigation (Brumfield and Gandy), the claims may be barred by res judicata
371 21 21 The factual background section of Kassab's counterclaim appears to be an explanation for why Kassab believes the lawsuit is retaliatory, not the basis of the counterclaims
372 21 21 Pohl is unable to ascertain the nature and basic issues presented by the counterclaim in order to adequately defend himself
373 21 21 Kassab appears more concerned with attacking Pohl than articulating the basis of his claims

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
    assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    assertion TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 4.692ms · Data license: Public court records