home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Key Assertions

1,237 material factual assertions from filings

Data license: Public court records

15 rows where filing_id = 24

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

assertion_id ▼ filing_id assertion
412 24 24 Kassab admitted the Assignments were made to 'potentially revive the barratry claims dismissed on limitations in Brumfield and Gandy'
413 24 24 After purported 'assignment,' clients retained 60% interest in claims and Kassab retained 40% contingent fee interest, demonstrating the Assignments were shams that altered nothing about claim ownership
414 24 24 The Assignments have 'no practical effect' by Kassab's own description and were 'effectuated in an attempt to salvage the clients' barratry claims'
415 24 24 Kassab was simultaneously representing clients in two appellate proceedings (Brumfield and Gandy) asserting the exact same claims without notifying those courts of the purported assignments
416 24 24 Pohl's briefing in the Texas Supreme Court referred to 'purported' assignments and notified the Court that Kassab had argued they were valid — this is not an inconsistent position
417 24 24 Pohl did not prevail on the alternative argument about the Assignments in the Texas Supreme Court, making judicial estoppel inapplicable
418 24 24 Kassab's estoppel argument selectively omitted the requirement that a party must have 'successfully maintained' a position for judicial estoppel to apply
419 24 24 PPG's reasoning about non-assignability was explicitly not limited to DTPA claims — it applies to a class of statutory punitive claims
420 24 24 The legislature knew how to make barratry claims assignable but the statute is silent on assignment
421 24 24 Kassab's citation of M.A. Mills v. Kotts was misleading — the court explicitly stated courts 'may deem these rules to be an expression of public policy, so that a contract violating them is unenforceable'
422 24 24 January 28, 2022 Notices in Brumfield (No. 21-0563) and Gandy (No. 21-0564) show the Texas Supreme Court denied petitions for review and dismissed Pohl's Motions to Dismiss as moot
423 24 24 Kassab devoted just over a single page of his 27-page Response to the dispositive res judicata argument
424 24 24 Kassab selectively omitted the word 'significant' from the logical relationship test standard
425 24 24 The risks of distortion discussed in PPG apply to barratry claims as a class, not just specific facts
426 24 24 Whether Pohl subsequently failed to obtain a hearing on special exceptions is irrelevant to whether fair notice was provided within the statutory period

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
    assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    assertion TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 5.134ms · Data license: Public court records