Key Assertions
Data license: Public court records
16 rows where filing_id = 46
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
| assertion_id ▼ | filing_id | assertion |
|---|---|---|
| 764 | 46 46 | Establishing barratry does not deny the factual bases of Pohl's claims or prevent establishment of claim elements |
| 765 | 46 46 | Client contracts procured through barratry are voidable (not void) and only the client can seek to void them under Tex. Gov't Code § 82.0651(a) |
| 766 | 46 46 | Not a single Pohl client contract has been declared void |
| 767 | 46 46 | Even voiding a contract would not divest an attorney of ownership of client list compilations or copies of contracts |
| 768 | 46 46 | Barratry is not a standalone affirmative defense to conversion, TUTSA, or conspiracy claims |
| 769 | 46 46 | There are no 'outlaws' under Texas law — Kassab's belief that Pohl engaged in barratry does not give Kassab the right to ignore Pohl's legal rights |
| 770 | 46 46 | Kassab cannot cite any Texas case where barratry was found to be an affirmative defense to trade secret theft or conversion |
| 771 | 46 46 | The unlawful acts doctrine was preempted by Dugger v. Arredondo and cannot be revived by calling it a different name |
| 772 | 46 46 | Kassab changed defense description from 'Illegality/Criminal Acts/Unlawful Acts Rule' (7th Answer) to 'Illegality/Criminal Acts' (8th Answer) after Pohl pointed out preemption |
| 773 | 46 46 | Kassab acknowledged in a different case that the unlawful acts doctrine was 'no longer good law' |
| 774 | 46 46 | Kassab acknowledged in his own summary judgment briefing that 'contract-related affirmative defenses of release, accord and satisfaction, estoppel do not apply to Kassab' |
| 775 | 46 46 | Justification is a defense only to tortious interference with contract, not to Pohl's claims |
| 776 | 46 46 | Rule 17.09 immunity requires the lawsuit to be 'predicated upon' grievance filing; Pohl's claims predated all grievances |
| 777 | 46 46 | Pohl will no longer seek equitable/injunctive relief, eliminating any basis for unclean hands defense |
| 778 | 46 46 | The Texas Supreme Court declared assumption of risk and contributory negligence no longer exist as independent defenses |
| 779 | 46 46 | Kassab has no standing to enforce barratry — only State Bar, State of Texas (criminal), and affected clients can do so |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
assertion TEXT
);