Key Assertions
Data license: Public court records
19 rows where filing_id = 53
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
| assertion_id ▼ | filing_id | assertion |
|---|---|---|
| 896 | 53 53 | Pohl objected to portions of 100 out of 145 questions in Kassab's DWQ |
| 897 | 53 53 | Kassab's motion is just over two pages and fails to specify which of Pohl's objections Kassab takes issue with |
| 898 | 53 53 | Favre has been aligned with Kassab and hostile to Pohl throughout the case history |
| 899 | 53 53 | Kassab hired Favre as an expert witness (six-figure up-front payment), Favre was a co-defendant, and Pohl alleges Favre was a co-conspirator with Kassab |
| 900 | 53 53 | Kassab initially argued leading questions were proper as 'cross examination' but removed that argument as directly contrary to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure |
| 901 | 53 53 | The nonsuit of Favre does not make him hostile to Kassab — Kassab cites no authority for that proposition |
| 902 | 53 53 | Pohl nonsuited multiple defendants as part of an unsuccessful strategy to prevent trial delay |
| 903 | 53 53 | Favre was so ill he could not sit for a full remote Zoom deposition; even when available, his lawyer could not commit he could complete a deposition in a single sitting |
| 904 | 53 53 | Kassab did not secure Favre's consent to a second DWQ, which was necessary since Favre was not subpoenaed |
| 905 | 53 53 | David Wade's actual statement was 'if you ask me that again, i will ask my client to sue' — described as 'facially non-serious' |
| 906 | 53 53 | Kassab demanded Wade and Pohl's counsel pay the cancelled deposition invoice the very next day after Favre's hospitalization |
| 907 | 53 53 | Kassab knew Favre was fighting the flu and had chemotherapy scheduled two days before the December 7 deposition |
| 908 | 53 53 | Kassab filed his motion complaining about non-response just 30 hours after the first scheduling email |
| 909 | 53 53 | The scheduling issue occurred after the leading questions were already served on February 20, 2023, so it cannot retroactively justify them |
| 910 | 53 53 | Evidence is not always necessary to support form objections |
| 911 | 53 53 | Question #3 contains multiple typos: 'How state how many,' 'compacity,' and 'carrier' |
| 912 | 53 53 | Question #15 ('Is PMG a marketing company?') is vague and not limited in time or scope |
| 913 | 53 53 | Question #18 ('Did PMG compile marketing lists?') calls for speculation since Favre purchased PMG after the alleged activities |
| 914 | 53 53 | Kassab concedes some questions have 'typos or misspellings' but did not fix them through amended redirect questions |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
assertion TEXT
);