fact_id,filing_id,fact
334,24,Kassab admitted the Assignments were made to 'revive the barratry claims dismissed on limitations in Brumfield and Gandy'
335,24,Kassab described how the Assignments have 'no practical effect' and were 'effectuated in an attempt to salvage the clients' barratry claims'
336,24,Kassab would return any recovery in excess of his contingency fee to the assignors — showing sham nature
337,24,"The Texas Supreme Court denied petitions for review in Brumfield (No. 21-0563) and Gandy (No. 21-0564) on January 28, 2022, and dismissed Pohl's Motions to Dismiss as moot"
338,24,Kassab was simultaneously litigating the same claims in appellate proceedings without notifying those courts of the Assignments
339,24,Kassab devoted just over a single page of his 27-page Response to the dispositive res judicata argument