fact_id,filing_id,fact
440,34,None of the four barratry suits have been adjudicated on the merits
441,34,Pohl provides no evidence supporting his traditional MSJ — only attorney arguments (which are not evidence per Johnson v. Scott)
442,34,Pohl refuses to swear under oath that he did not commit barratry
443,34,"Three expert reports (Hardwick, Cooper, Cleveland) establish that Pohl committed barratry"
444,34,The Cheatham court of appeals found same Walker testimony constituted 'some evidence' that Pohl and co-counsel coordinated the barratry scheme
445,34,Ladner testified 'client information' was owned by Precision Marketing (deposition at 44-45)
446,34,Walker testified client list and documents were Precision Marketing's 'work product' (deposition at 250-251)
447,34,Walker pled guilty to federal program fraud and conspiracy for diverting and misusing federal grants
448,34,"Pohl knew Walker was a convicted felon but never required confidentiality or NDA (Pohl deposition at 22-23, 104-105, 159-161)"
449,34,Pohl's own lawyers used illegality defense in Duncan Litig. Invs. and in the Mississippi Litigation
450,34,Pohl has unreasonably resisted Kassab's discovery requests on illegality defense since May 2021 through January 2022
451,34,"Kassab filed Motion to Compel on August 25, 2022 after Pohl refused to amend discovery responses"
452,34,Pohl's First Amended Petition requests injunctive relief (¶ 45) and equitable relief (¶ 50)
453,34,"Kassab filed prior MSJ on June 8, 2021 and another on August 29, 2022"