home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Key Facts

899 material facts asserted in filings

Data license: Public court records

29 rows where filing_id = 66

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

fact_id ▼ filing_id fact
831 66 66 Filed January 19, 2024, simultaneously with JNOV Motion, within 30 days of Dec. 22, 2023 Final Judgment
832 66 66 22 grounds for new trial enumerated
833 66 66 December 8, 2023: Walker called Kassab and confessed to 30% promise, coached depositions, reversed testimony
834 66 66 Walker and Ladner were co-owners of Precision Marketing Group
835 66 66 Walker initially signed agreement that 17 boxes of materials were Precision's, not Pohl's
836 66 66 In Mississippi: Walker testified Pohl paid Precision $5M in barratry money, 'clear it was barratry'
837 66 66 In this case: Walker recanted, said Nicholson taught him about barratry, 'advised him to lie'
838 66 66 In recorded call: Walker confirmed 'it was barratry' and 'some of the things that we were doing was, in fact, barratry'
839 66 66 Kassab did not call Walker/Ladner as live witnesses because of reversed deposition testimony
840 66 66 Mary Francis Arnold (office manager) testified: contracts not trade secrets, not secured, Pohl never said they were trade secrets, kept in unlocked cabinets at home
841 66 66 Client lists created by Jimmy Williamson and Precision; Pohl testified he did not have a list
842 66 66 Information kept unsecured in Ladner's garage; stored in Precision storage unit accessible to anyone
843 66 66 Master list on PACER for six years; produced in Mississippi discovery without protective order
844 66 66 Professor Benjamin Cooper: expert testimony that Pohl committed unauthorized practice of law excluded
845 66 66 Q2 improperly included direct misappropriation theory when only indirect misappropriation pled
846 66 66 Jury found Precision did NOT misappropriate but found Kassab 70% responsible — inconsistency
847 66 66 Q5 jury answered August 19, 2017 but Pohl knew of Precision's theft in June 2014
848 66 66 Kassab's proposed questions 6, 7, and 8 all refused by Court
849 66 66 Q6 'while in an attorney client relationship' language: improper comment on weight of evidence
850 66 66 Pohl stipulated in post-trial briefing he was not seeking equitable remedies
851 66 66 No evidence of Kassab's net worth presented to jury
852 66 66 TUTSA caps exemplary at 2x actual loss — $500,000 max if attorney fees excluded
853 66 66 Billing invoices heavily redacted — impossible to determine tasks, timing, performers
854 66 66 Zavitsanos: Pohl's attorney fee expert, conclusory under Rohrmoos/Arthur Andersen factors
855 66 66 Zavitsanos not qualified on appellate fees, provided only conclusory lump sums
856 66 66 No fee segregation between TUTSA claim (recoverable) and conversion claim (unrecoverable)
857 66 66 Responsible third party designations denied: George W. Shepherd, Donalda Pohl, Edgar Jaimes, Ken Talley, Magdalena Santana
858 66 66 Cheatham v. Pohl: pending civil barratry case; Pohl sought fees in this case for defending it
859 66 66 Pohl claimed privilege over Shepherd communications and unredacted billing records

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE key_facts (
    fact_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    fact TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 4.725ms · Data license: Public court records