theory_id,filing_id,theory,party,role,basis
177,21,Lack of Legal Capacity — Tex. R. Civ. P. 93(1) and 93(2),Pohl,defense,Kassab lacks legal capacity to sue on assigned barratry claims because such assignments (whether complete or partial) are void
178,21,Special Exceptions for Defective Pleading — Texas fair notice pleading standard,Pohl,defense,"Kassab's counterclaim is obscure and fails to provide fair notice of the nature, basic issues, and potentially relevant evidence of the controversy; fails to identify cause of action, assignors, or supporting facts"
179,21,Statute of Limitations,Pohl,affirmative_defense,Barratry claims are time-barred
180,21,Laches,Pohl,affirmative_defense,Unreasonable delay in asserting claims
181,21,Lack of Standing,Pohl,affirmative_defense,Kassab does not have standing to assert assigned barratry claims
182,21,Illegality,Pohl,affirmative_defense,The assignments themselves are illegal/void
183,21,Res Judicata,Pohl,affirmative_defense,The assigned claims may be the same claims previously asserted and adjudicated in Brumfield and Gandy cases
184,21,Estoppel,Pohl,affirmative_defense,Defense to Kassab's counterclaims
185,21,Failure to Mitigate,Pohl,affirmative_defense,Defense to Kassab's counterclaims
186,21,Waiver,Pohl,affirmative_defense,Defense to Kassab's counterclaims