theory_id,filing_id,theory,party,role,basis
66,8,Statute of Limitations,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl's claims are time-barred
67,8,Justification,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Kassab's conduct was justified
68,8,Estoppel,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl is estopped from asserting claims
69,8,Waiver,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl waived his claims
70,8,Ratification,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl ratified the conduct complained of
71,8,Release,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl released Kassab from liability
72,8,Unclean Hands,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl's own illegal barratry precludes equitable relief
73,8,Contribution,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Other parties share responsibility for any damages
74,8,Failure to Mitigate Damages,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl failed to mitigate his damages
75,8,Lack of Standing,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl does not own the allegedly converted property
76,8,Accord and Satisfaction,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Claims resolved by accord and satisfaction
77,8,Assumption of the Risk,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl assumed the risk of the alleged harm
78,8,Illegality/Criminal Acts,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl's claims arise from his own criminal conduct (barratry)
79,8,First Amendment,Kassab,affirmative_defense,"Kassab's conduct is protected speech, petition, and association"
80,8,Attorney Immunity,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Kassab's conduct falls within scope of client representation
81,8,In Pari Delicto,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl is equally at fault
82,8,Res Judicata,Kassab,affirmative_defense,Pohl's claims were or should have been litigated in the Mississippi Litigation (new defense added in this amended answer)