legal_theories: 155
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| theory_id | filing_id | theory | party | role | basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 155 | 17 | Res Judicata Rebuttal — No Privity, Different Subject Matter | Pohl | defense | Kassab was not a party to the Federal Court Case. Under Texas three-part privity test, mere allegations of conspiracy are insufficient. Kassab provides no evidence of control, representation of interests, or successor-in-interest status. The factual bases differ: Federal Counterclaim addressed conversion of funds (billing fraud), not theft of confidential information. |