home / kassab_analytics / legal_theories

Menu
  • Search all tables

legal_theories: 155

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

theory_id filing_id theory party role basis
155 17 Res Judicata Rebuttal — No Privity, Different Subject Matter Pohl defense Kassab was not a party to the Federal Court Case. Under Texas three-part privity test, mere allegations of conspiracy are insufficient. Kassab provides no evidence of control, representation of interests, or successor-in-interest status. The factual bases differ: Federal Counterclaim addressed conversion of funds (billing fraud), not theft of confidential information.
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.408ms · Data license: Public court records