legal_theories: 262

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

theory_id	filing_id	theory	party	role	basis
262	34	Illegality	Kassab	affirmative_defense	Pohl obtained trade secrets through illegal barratry and unauthorized practice of law, negating 'rightful, legal, or equitable title' required by TUTSA; commonly applied to bar claims from barratry (Luong v. McAllister; Plumlee v. Paddock); Pohl's own lawyers used this defense in Duncan Litig. Invs. and Mississippi Litigation