Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

4 rows where filing_id = 29

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
236 29 29 TUTSA Preemption (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.007(a)) Kassab affirmative_defense TUTSA displaces conflicting tort, restitutionary, and other laws providing civil remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret, potentially preempting Pohl's conversion and conspiracy claims
237 29 29 Bad Faith TUTSA Claims — Attorney's Fees (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.005) Kassab claim All or some of Plaintiffs' claims for misappropriation under TUTSA were made in bad faith, enabling Defendants to recover reasonable attorney's fees
238 29 29 Civil Barratry Counterclaim via Assigned Claims (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.069) Kassab counterclaim Counterclaims for barratry on behalf of 242 assigned claimants, timely as compulsory counterclaims filed within 30 days of original answer
239 29 29 20 Affirmative Defenses (carried from Fifth Amended Answer) Kassab affirmative_defense Statute of limitations, justification, estoppel, waiver, ratification, release, unclean hands, contribution, failure to mitigate, lack of standing, accord and satisfaction, assumption of risk, illegality/criminal acts, First Amendment, attorney immunity, in pari delicto, res judicata, defect of parties, abandonment, subject of a valid contract

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);