Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

4 rows where filing_id = 38

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
289 38 38 Abatement for pending related litigation Kassab defense Kassab argues Cheatham case outcome will impact his illegality defense and that Pohl is still incurring damages
290 38 38 Future damages do not justify abatement (rebuttal) Pohl claim Texas law requires parties to bring claims even when all damages have not occurred (Schlumberger v. Pasko); future damages assessed by reasonable probability standard (GTE Mobilnet v. Pascouet)
291 38 38 Unlawful Acts Doctrine preemption (rebuttal) Pohl claim Texas Supreme Court in Dugger v. Arredondo held the doctrine is 'no longer a viable defense' under § 33.003; confirmed in Boerjan v. Rodriguez; Kassab himself acknowledged this in Beatty v. Knighton
292 38 38 Unclean Hands (rebutted) Kassab affirmative_defense Defense applies only to equitable relief and requires injury to party raising defense (In re Nolle); damages are not equitable relief; Kassab has not alleged Pohl's conduct harmed him

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);