statute_id,filing_id,statute,description,cited_by
182,34,Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(i),No-evidence summary judgment rule — motion must state the elements as to which there is no evidence; does not authorize conclusory motions,Kassab
183,34,Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c),Traditional summary judgment — movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law; defective no-evidence motion is treated under this standard,Kassab
184,34,Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(g),"Allows continuance to permit affidavits, depositions, or discovery before ruling on summary judgment",Kassab
185,34,Tex. R. Civ. P. 13,Duty to investigate claims before filing — Kassab had obligation to investigate potential barratry claims or risk sanctions,Kassab
186,34,Tex. R. Civ. P. 58,Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in another pleading or motion — used to incorporate prior MSJs and Nicholson filings,Kassab
187,34,Tex. Disc. R. Prof'l Cond. 8.03,Duty to report lawyer misconduct — lawyer having knowledge of another lawyer's violation shall inform appropriate disciplinary authority,Kassab
188,34,Tex. R. Disc. P. 17.09,No lawsuit may be instituted against any complainant or witness predicated upon filing of a grievance or participation in the disciplinary system,Kassab
189,34,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.002(3-a),"Defines 'owner' of trade secret as person with rightful, legal, or equitable title — Pohl's illegal acquisition through barratry negates ownership",Kassab
190,34,"Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 134A.002(1), (3), (6)",TUTSA definitions relevant to trade secret ownership elements,Kassab
191,34,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.004(a),TUTSA cause of action for misappropriation of trade secrets — first element requires plaintiff owned a trade secret,Kassab
192,34,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.005,Attorney's fees for bad faith TUTSA claims,Kassab