statute_id,filing_id,statute,description,cited_by
220,43,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.011(6),"Definition of responsible third party as any person alleged to have caused or contributed to causing in any way the harm for which recovery of damages is sought, whether by negligent act or omission, defective product, or other conduct violating an applicable legal standard",Kassab
221,43,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ch. 33 (2003 revision),Referenced in footnote 9 — Legislature abolished predecessor law requiring responsible third parties to be within court's jurisdiction,Kassab
222,43,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.069,"Compulsory counterclaim statute — counterclaim or cross claim arising from same transaction may be filed even if independently time-barred, but must be filed within 30 days of when party's answer is required",Kassab
223,43,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.005,TUTSA provision allowing recovery of attorney's fees when misappropriation claims are made in bad faith,Kassab
224,43,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.007(a),TUTSA preemption of other claims — cited as basis for affirmative defense #23,Kassab
225,43,Tex. Penal Code § 38.12,Criminal barratry statute — third-degree felony; referenced in factual background describing Pohl's alleged conduct,Kassab
226,43,Tex. Disciplinary Rules Prof'l Conduct R. 8.03,Mandatory duty to report lawyer misconduct to disciplinary authority; Kassab cites as basis for filing grievances against Pohl,Kassab
227,43,Tex. Rules Disciplinary P. R. 17.09,Immunity for filing grievances and participation in the disciplinary system; cited as affirmative defense #17,Kassab