statute_id,filing_id,statute,description,cited_by
201,36,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a),Two-year statute of limitations for conversion,Pohl
202,36,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.010(a),Three-year statute of limitations for TUTSA violations,Pohl
203,36,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.002(3-a),"TUTSA definition of 'owner' — person with rightful, legal, or equitable title to trade secret",Pohl
204,36,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.004(a),TUTSA damages include 'actual loss caused by misappropriation' — Pohl argues defense fees qualify,Pohl
205,36,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.002,"Proportionate responsibility statute applicable to tort claims — conversion, trade secret theft, conspiracy are subject torts",Pohl
206,36,Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.003,Plain language indicates common law unlawful acts doctrine is no longer viable defense,Pohl
207,36,Tex. R. Evid. 801(3),Hearsay exclusion limited to depositions from same proceeding; depositions from other lawsuits are inadmissible hearsay,Pohl
208,36,Tex. R. Evid. 902(10),Requirements for business records self-authentication — Kassab's authentication fails,Pohl
209,36,Tex. R. Evid. 803(6)(A),Business records exception requires record made by someone with personal knowledge — David Kassab lacks knowledge of third-party documents,Pohl
210,36,Tex. R. Evid. 503,"Lawyer representative privilege — employees, consultants, vendors who qualify share confidentiality duties",Pohl
211,36,Tex. Gov't Code § 82.0651(a),"Attorney-client contracts procured through barratry are voidable by client action, not void — none of Pohl's contracts have been declared void",Pohl
212,36,Tex. R. Disc. P. 17.09,"Immunity for grievance filings — Pohl argues inapplicable because claims are based on conversion/theft, not grievance filing",Pohl