home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

8 rows where party = "Pohl" and role = "affirmative_defense"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: basis

role 1

  • affirmative_defense · 8 ✖

party 1

  • Pohl · 8 ✖
theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
179 21 21 Statute of Limitations Pohl affirmative_defense Barratry claims are time-barred
180 21 21 Laches Pohl affirmative_defense Unreasonable delay in asserting claims
181 21 21 Lack of Standing Pohl affirmative_defense Kassab does not have standing to assert assigned barratry claims
182 21 21 Illegality Pohl affirmative_defense The assignments themselves are illegal/void
183 21 21 Res Judicata Pohl affirmative_defense The assigned claims may be the same claims previously asserted and adjudicated in Brumfield and Gandy cases
184 21 21 Estoppel Pohl affirmative_defense Defense to Kassab's counterclaims
185 21 21 Failure to Mitigate Pohl affirmative_defense Defense to Kassab's counterclaims
186 21 21 Waiver Pohl affirmative_defense Defense to Kassab's counterclaims

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 6.416ms · Data license: Public court records