home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Key Assertions

1,237 material factual assertions from filings

Data license: Public court records

31 rows where filing_id = 67

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

assertion_id ▼ filing_id assertion
1181 67 67 Kassab's motions repeat arguments previously considered and rejected at summary judgment, 166(g) hearings, pre-trial hearings, directed verdict, and otherwise
1182 67 67 The jury verdict is supported by nearly two weeks of trial evidence
1183 67 67 Kassab has not filed a proposed order as required by court procedures — constitutional minimum requirements prevent pro forma new trial orders
1184 67 67 Walker is a self-professed perjurer and extortionist who first tried to extort Pohl for share of judgment; Pohl refused; Walker then approached Kassab to sell testimony
1185 67 67 Walker gave testimony in 2018 on the two topics at issue consistent with his 2022 testimony in this case — demonstrably untrue that he reversed course
1186 67 67 Kassab did not disclose to Court during mistrial request that Walker approached Kassab offering to sell testimony to undermine judgment
1187 67 67 Kassab waived Q2 objection — charge conference transcript shows counsel stated 'Not to Number 2' when Court asked for objections
1188 67 67 Kassab also waived Q3 objection — he insisted on including wrongful conduct question at charge conference
1189 67 67 Kassab waived jury verdict inconsistency objection by not asserting before Court dismissed jury (Bryan v. Papalia)
1190 67 67 No inconsistency: jury could find Precision obtained information lawfully (while working for Pohl) but Kassab misappropriated through post-acquisition use/disclosure
1191 67 67 Attorney does not act as agent when fee contract is drafted or before it is signed; client does not own collection of contracts
1192 67 67 Jury heard testimony about locked office above bank with security, workers understood confidentiality requirements
1193 67 67 Kassab was willing to pay over six figures to access attorney-client contracts — inconsistent with claim information was publicly available
1194 67 67 Pohl's claims accrued no earlier than November 2016 when Kassab purchased confidential information; suit filed less than 2 years later
1195 67 67 Unlawful acts doctrine preempted by proportionate responsibility statute — Dugger found it 'no longer a viable defense'
1196 67 67 No Texas case law supports Kassab's claimed privilege to engage in trade secret misappropriation to expose wrongdoing
1197 67 67 No attorney-client relationship existed when Kassab used trade secrets for mass solicitation — cannot pre-date contact with prospective client
1198 67 67 Rule 17.09 inapplicable because claim accrued upon acquisition/use of information, which occurred before any grievance filing
1199 67 67 Judicial proceedings privilege applies only to libel/slander claims for communications in judicial proceedings
1200 67 67 Kassab only successfully obtained clients after purchasing Pohl's trade secrets for mass solicitation — prior public-information letters were unsuccessful
1201 67 67 LaCore Enterprises dealt with fees from same proceeding, not other cases — Kassab was warned about mischaracterizing this case
1202 67 67 Pohl's expert Zavitsanos applied blanket 10% discount to fees to account for unnecessary/unrecoverable entries
1203 67 67 Kassab involved in drumming up seven failed grievances against Pohl
1204 67 67 Kassab publicized unreviewed grievance to TX AG, Harris County DA, Houston Chronicle, Texas Lawyer, and Bar President candidate — unprecedented
1205 67 67 Kassab secretly purchased Pohl's client files under guise of phony expert agreement, then lied to jury about its nature despite federal judge calling it purchase agreement
1206 67 67 Kassab indemnified Favre against claims related to disclosure — demonstrating knowledge of breach of confidentiality
1207 67 67 Shepherd produced nearly half million pages of documents at Kassab's request
1208 67 67 Kassab concealed identity of who assigned barratry claims to avoid disclosing duplicative assertion in separate lawsuit
1209 67 67 Pohl has never been found by any adjudicatory body to have committed barratry
1210 67 67 Jury found over $2M in actual damages; $3M exemplary complies with TUTSA 2x cap
1211 67 67 Kassab's proportionate responsibility question improper — Pohl could not have misappropriated his own trade secrets under § 33.011(4)

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE key_assertions (
    assertion_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    assertion TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 4.4ms · Data license: Public court records